Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Classical Theory: Affinities Rather than Divergences

In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), From Philosophy of Fiction to Cognitive Poetics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. pp. 93-115 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Conceptual Metaphor Theory makes some strong claims against so-called Classical Theory which spans the accounts of metaphors from Aristotle to Davidson. Most of these theories, because of their traditional literal-metaphorical distinction, fail to take into account the phenomenon of conceptual metaphor. I argue that the underlying mechanism for explaining metaphor bears some striking resemblances among all of these theories. A mapping between two structures is always expressed. Conceptual Metaphor Theory insists, however, that the literal-metaphorical distinction of Classical Theories is empirically wrong. I claim that this criticism is based rather on terminological decisions than on empirical issues. Conceptual Metaphor Theory focusses primarily on conventional metaphors and struggles to extend its mechanism to novel metaphors, whereas Classical Theories focus on novel metaphors and struggle to extend their mechanisms to conventional metaphors. Since all of these theories study metaphors from the synchronic point of view, they are unable to take into account any semantic change. A diachronic perspective is what we need here, one which would allow us to explain the role of metaphor in semantic change and the development of language in general.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Philosophical Examination of Metaphor.Patti Diane Nogales - 1993 - Dissertation, Stanford University
A Defense of Davidson's Theory of Metaphor.Robert Bower Horner - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Miami
Extending the Metaphor: Lessons for Language.M. Lynne Tirrell - 1986 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
A Tale of Two Tropes: How Metaphor and Simile Differ.Catrinel Haught - 2013 - Metaphor and Symbol 28 (4):254 - 274.
Something false about conceptual metaphors.J. Nick Reid & Albert N. Katz - 2018 - Metaphor and Symbol 33 (1):36-47.
Metaphor and Constancy of Meaning.Sherrill Jean Begres - 1992 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 43 (1):143-161.
Metaphor and Constancy of Meaning.Sherrill Jean Begres - 1992 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 43 (1):143-161.


Added to PP

1,494 (#4,191)

6 months
375 (#1,319)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jakub Mácha
Masaryk University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Leviathan.Thomas Hobbes - 1651 - New York: Harmondsworth, Penguin.
Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1975 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 47.
Logic and Conversation.H. P. Grice - 1975 - In Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds.), The Logic of Grammar. Encino, CA: pp. 64-75.
Leviathan.Thomas Hobbes - 2006 - In Aloysius Martinich, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.

View all 23 references / Add more references