BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):14 (2015)

Rachel Baker
Florida State University
Many publicly-funded health systems apply cost-benefit frameworks in response to the moral dilemma of how best to allocate scarce healthcare resources. However, implementation of recommendations based on costs and benefit calculations and subsequent challenges have led to ‘special cases’ with certain types of health benefits considered more valuable than others. Recent debate and research has focused on the relative value of life extensions for people with terminal illnesses. This research investigates societal perspectives in relation to this issue, in the UK
Keywords Social values  Life extension  Terminal illness  Societal perspectives  Health policy  Ethics  Resource allocation  Q methodology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1186/s12910-015-0008-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,473
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Economic Inequality.Amartya Sen - 1997 - Clarendon Press.
A Kantian View of Suicide and End-of-Life Treatment.Martin Gunderson - 2004 - Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (2):277–287.
A Kantian View of Suicide and End‐of‐Life Treatment.Martin Gunderson - 2004 - Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (2):277-287.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
51 ( #207,531 of 2,446,292 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #456,806 of 2,446,292 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes