Why does God exist?

Religious Studies 58 (1):236-257 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Many philosophers have appealed to the PSR in arguments for a being that exists a se, a being whose explanation is in itself. But what does it mean, exactly, for something to have its explanation ‘in itself’? Contemporary philosophers have said next to nothing about this, relying instead on phrases plucked from the accounts of various historical figures. In this article, I analyse five such accounts – those of Anselm, Aquinas, Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz – and argue that none are satisfactory. Should we abandon or restrict the PSR, then? I think that would be hasty, for many reasons. I therefore consider the prospects of explaining everything, including God, given the constraints of certain features of good explanations, and conclude with several observations about future approaches.

Similar books and articles

Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God.Mogens Laerke - 2011 - Archiv Fuer Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):58 - 84.
Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God.Mogens Lærke - 2011 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):58-84.
Cartesian Aseity in the Third Meditation.Landon McBrayer - 2018 - Journal of Analytic Theology 6:217-233.
Explanation and the Cosmological Argument.Bruce Reichenbach - 2004 - In Michael Peterson & Raymond vanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. London: Blackwell. pp. 97-114.
St. Anselm’s Argument.M. J. Charlesworth - 2019 - In Peter Wong, Sherah Bloor, Patrick Hutchings & Purushottama Bilimoria (eds.), Considering Religions, Rights and Bioethics: For Max Charlesworth. Springer Verlag. pp. 105-114.
Der Ursprung der Leibnizschen Wahrheitstheorie.Edwin Curley - 1988 - Studia Leibnitiana 20 (2):160-174.
Les Enjeux de la Publication En France des Papiers de Leibniz Sur Spinoza.P. -F. Moreau - 1988 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 93 (2):215 - 222.
Ontological Argument in Leibniz's Philosophy.Ali Tahiri - unknown - Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 39.
Spinoza’s Arguments for the Existence of God.Martin Lin - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):269-297.
Merely Possible Explanation.Ghislain Guigon - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (3):359-370.
Leibniz on Cartesian Omnipotence and Contingency.David Werther - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (1):23 - 36.


Added to PP

392 (#27,725)

6 months
117 (#5,297)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

C. A. McIntosh
Cornell University (PhD)

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Identity and Necessity.Saul A. Kripke - 1971 - In Milton Karl Munitz (ed.), Identity and Individuation. New York: New York University Press. pp. 135-164.
Philosophical Explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Mind 93 (371):450-455.
XIV—Ontological Dependence.Kit Fine - 1995 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95 (1):269-290.
An essay on free will.Peter van Inwagen & A. Phillips Griffiths - 1985 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 175 (4):557-558.
Explanation.Martin Glazier - 2020 - In Michael J. Raven (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Metaphysical Grounding. London: pp. 121-132.

View all 31 references / Add more references