Teaching Philosophy 20 (1):49-60 (1997)
This paper critiques the standard presentation of arguments from analogy in logic textbooks and offers an alternative way of understanding them which renders them both more plausible and more easily evaluated for their strength. The typical presentation presents analogies as inductive arguments in which a set of properties, known to be shared by two logical domains, supports an inference about a further property, known to belong to one domain and inferred to belong to the target domain. But framed in these terms, the strength of the argument depends entirely on the relevance of the known shared properties to the inferred shared property, meaning the argument rests on an unstated assumption. Against this view, the author maintains that arguments from analogy are figurative ways of addressing properties of the target logical domain. By comparing or contrasting two logical domains, analogies articulate a general principle which illustrates something difficult to imagine or to describe literally about the target domain. Analogies can be reformulated and evaluated as deductive arguments on this view, with their chief logical import being the inquiry they incite in students as to whether the general principle is true and sufficiently general to apply to the target domain
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Argument From Analogy is Not an Argument for Other Mnds.Richard I. Sikora - 1977 - American Philosophical Quarterly 14 (April):137-41.
Abortion, Analogies and the Emergence of Value.Paul F. Camenisch - 1976 - Journal of Religious Ethics 4 (1):131 - 158.
TIDAC: Identity, Analogy, and Logical Argument in Science.Allen MacNeill - 2009 - The Evolution List.
Analogy: A Study of Qualification and Argument in Theology.Humphrey Palmer - 1973 - Macmillan.
Just What is Wrong with the Argument From Analogy?Don Locke - 1973 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (August):153-56.
Killing, Letting Die, and the Morality of Abortion.Anton Tupa - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):1-26.
A Problem with Alston's Indirect Analogy-Argument From Religious Experience.Ulf Zackariasson - 2006 - Religious Studies 42 (3):329-341.
Gentiles and Homosexuals: A Brief History of an Analogy.John Perry - 2010 - Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (2):321-347.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads21 ( #227,723 of 2,143,475 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #56,382 of 2,143,475 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.