Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (3):305-326 (2005)

Abstract
This paper responds to criticism of the Kripkean account of logical truth in first-order modal logic. The criticism, largely ignored in the literature, claims that when the box and diamond are interpreted as the logical modality operators, the Kripkean account is extensionally incorrect because it fails to reflect the fact that all sentences stating truths about what is logically possible are themselves logically necessary. I defend the Kripkean account by arguing that some true sentences about logical possibility are not logically necessary
Keywords Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10992-005-2273-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,825
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Themes From Kaplan.Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.) - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
Essence and Modality.Kit Fine - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8:1-16.
On Quantifier Domain Restriction.Jason Stanley & Zoltán Gendler Szabó - 2000 - Mind and Language 15 (2-3):219--61.
Conceivability and Possibility.Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.) - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
A Completeness Theorem in Modal Logic.Saul A. Kripke - 1959 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 24 (1):1-14.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Logical Truth in Modal Logic.Matthew McKeon - 1996 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):351-361.
Bertrand Russell and Logical Truth.Matthew Mckeon - 1999 - Philosophia 27 (3-4):541-553.
Ray on Tarski on Logical Consequence.William H. Hanson - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (6):605-616.
On the Substitutional Characterization of First-Order Logical Truth.Matthew McKeon - 2004 - History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (3):205-224.
A Defense of Contingent Logical Truths.Michael Nelson & Edward N. Zalta - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 157 (1):153-162.
Modal Logic and the “Possible".Francois Schmitz - 1997 - Logica Trianguli 1:105-114.
Borderline Logic.David H. Sanford - 1975 - American Philosophical Quarterly 12 (1):29-39.
Logical Consequence: A Defense of Tarski.Greg Ray - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (6):617 - 677.
Is Modal Logic Logic?Gilbert Harman - 1972 - Philosophia 2 (1-2):75-84.
Pure Second-Order Logic with Second-Order Identity.Alexander Paseau - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (3):351-360.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
57 ( #172,950 of 2,401,683 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #198,273 of 2,401,683 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes