Authors
Amy Lynn McKiernan
Dickenson College
Abstract
This article notices a trend in work done by philosophers who build on P. F. Strawson’s account of the reactive attitudes; it looks as though philosophers supplement Strawson with a more robust ethical program in order to address questions concerning the moral appropriateness of the reactive attitudes. I argue feminist care ethics can serve as a promising moral supplement to Strawson. Then, I diagnose a problem in Strawson— namely, the assumption that members of moral communities will express all three kinds of reactive attitudes. Once we consider these three expressions from a feminist perspective, it becomes clear that while some may express indignation on behalf of others and guilt toward themselves, many will not express resentment directly toward others for good reasons under oppressive conditions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Self-Blaming, Repentance, and Atonement.Peter A. French - 2014 - Journal of Value Inquiry 48 (4):587-602.
Shaming, Blaming, and Responsibility.Lucy McDonald - 2020 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 18 (2):131-155.
Valuing Blame.Christopher Evan Franklin - 2013 - In D. Justin Coates & Neal A. Tognazzini (eds.), Blame: Its Nature and Norms. Oxford University Press.
In the Birdcage of the Muses. [REVIEW]Philip Hardie - 1994 - The Chesterton Review 44 (1):41-43.
What’s Wrong with Hypocrisy.Kartik Upadhyaya - 2020 - Dissertation, University of Warwick
Answerability Without Blame?Andrea Westlund - 2018 - In Katrina Hutchison, Catriona Mackenzie & Marina Oshana (eds.), Social Dimensions of Moral Responsibility.
True Blame.Randolph Clarke & Piers Rawling - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-14.
Punishment, Retribution, Restoration.Arnold Burms & Gerbert Faure - 2016 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 78 (4):851-862.
How Not to Defend Moral Blame.Andreas Leonhard Menges - 2014 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (1):1-7.
Belief in a Just World, Religiosity and Victim Blaming.Hasan Kaplan - 2012 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 34 (3):397-409.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-04-01

Total views
6 ( #1,133,122 of 2,506,113 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #118,921 of 2,506,113 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes