Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):149-168 (2005)

Michael McKinsey
Wayne State University
In this admirable book, Scott Soames provides well defended answers to some of the most difficult and important questions in the philosophy of language, and he does so with characteristic thoroughness, clarity, and rigor. The book's title is appropriate, since it does indeed go ‘beyond rigidity’ in many ways. Among other things, Soames does the following in the course of the book. He persuasively argues that the main thesis of Kripke's Naming and Necessity—that ordinary names are rigid designators—can be extended to the more general thesis that simple proper names are synonymous with neither nonrigid nor rigidified descriptions, and so have no descriptive content whatever. He thoroughly defends and places in the context of a larger semantic theory the Millian thesis that the sole semantic contents of most proper names are the names' referents, so that sentences containing such names semantically express singular Russellian propositions. He provides and defends at length an innovative pragmatic account of why substitution of co-referring proper names in cognitive contexts intuitively fails to be truth preserving, even though it seems to follow from the Millian thesis that such substitution must be semantically valid. And he thoroughly and persuasively defends a semantic theory of natural kind terms that explains how, following Kripke and Putnam, theoretical identities involving such terms can express a posteriori necessities, even though on Soames's theory, and contrary to the Kripke-Putnam view, such terms are neither names of natural kinds nor rigid designators in any interesting sense.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0045-5091
DOI 10.1080/00455091.2005.10716585
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1975 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 47.
On Quantifier Domain Restriction.Jason Stanley & Zoltán Gendler Szabó - 2000 - Mind and Language 15 (2-3):219--61.
Conversational Impliciture.Kent Bach - 1994 - Mind and Language 9 (2):124-162.
Conversational Impliciture.Kent Bach - 1994 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 284.
Direct Reference.Francois Recanati - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (4):953-956.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Millian Descriptivism.Ben Caplan - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (2):181-198.
A Pragmatic Defense of Millianism.Arvid Båve - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 138 (2):271 - 289.
Frege's Puzzle and Descriptive Enrichment.Jeff Speaks - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2):267-282.
On Sense and Direct Reference.Ben Caplan - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (2):171-185.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Critical Notice.Christian Piller - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (2):347-367.
Critical Notice of Robert Audi, The Good in the Right.Anthony Skelton - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):305-325.
Critical Notice.Michael D. Resnik - 1992 - Mind 101 (401):107 - 122.
Critical Notice.Michael R. Depaul - 1990 - Mind 99 (396):619 - 633.
Critical Notice.Michael Dummett - 1980 - Mind 89 (356):605 - 616.
Critical Notice.Michael Clark - 1975 - Mind 84 (333):122 - 136.
Critical Notice.Michael Milde - 1998 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28 (1):119-143.


Added to PP index

Total views
136 ( #78,027 of 2,448,696 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #178,140 of 2,448,696 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes