Love: what's sex got to do with it?

International Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (2):201-218 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is usually taken for granted that romantic relationships will be sexual, but it seems that there is no necessary reason for this, as it is possible for romantic relationships to not include sex. Indeed, sometimes sex is a part of a romantic relationship for only a relatively short period of it. Furthermore, scientific explanations of the link between sex and love don’t seem fully satisfying because they tell us only about the mechanics of sex, rather than its meaning or phenomenology. Therefore, the question of why it is that the archetypal romantic relationship includes sex, calls for philosophical analysis, yet it has been under-explored in philosophy. In this paper, I attempt to remedy this. I argue that sex is important to romantic love because it partly constitutes, builds, and expresses four of the central goods of a romantic relationship: 1) pleasure, 2) union, 3) intimacy, and 4) vulnerability and care. Thus, sex can be, and often is, an important vehicle for romantic love, though it is not essential for it.

Similar books and articles

The Unity of Romantic Love.Alan Soble - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):374-397.
Romantic Love.Thomas H. Smith - 2011 - Essays in Philosophy 12 (1):68-92.
Romantic Love: A Patchwork.Carol Caraway - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 2 (1):361-368.
Romantic Love: Neither Sexist Nor Heterosexist.Carol Caraway - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):361-368.
Romantic Love: A Patchwork.Carol Caraway - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 2 (1):76-96.
Just Friends, Friends and Lovers, Or…?Caroline J. Simon - 1993 - Philosophy and Theology 8 (2):113-128.
Romantic Love: Neither Sexist Nor Heterosexist.Carol Caraway - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):361-368.
Romantic Love: A Philosophical Inquiry.Dwight Van de Vate Jr - 1981 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Romantic Love and Christianity.Shirley Robin Letwin - 1977 - Philosophy 52 (200):131 - 145.
Romantic Love as an Entry to Agape.Danielle Poe - 2005 - The Acorn 13 (1):35-41.
Love and Structure.Charles Lindholm - 1998 - Theory, Culture and Society 15 (3-4):243-263.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-12

Downloads
376 (#29,306)

6 months
46 (#22,315)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Natasha McKeever
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

Why, and to What Extent, is Sexual Infidelity Wrong?Natasha McKeever - 2020 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 101 (3):515-537.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references