Authors
Robin McKenna
University of Liverpool
Abstract
Keith DeRose’s new book The Appearance of Ignorance is a welcome companion volume to his 2009 book The Case for Contextualism. Where latter focused on contextualism as a view in the philosophy of language, the former focuses on how contextualism contributes to our understanding of some perennial epistemological problems, with the skeptical problem being the main focus of six of the seven chapters. DeRose’s view is that a solution to the skeptical problem must do two things. First, it must explain how it is that we can know lots of things, such as that we have hands. Second, it must explain how it can seem that we don’t know these things. In slogan form, DeRose’s argument is that a contextualist semantics for knowledge attributions is needed to account for the “appearance of ignorance”—the appearance that we don’t know that skeptical hypotheses fail to obtain. In my critical discussion, I will argue inter alia that we don’t need a contextualist semantics to account for the appearance of ignorance, and in any case that the “strength” of the appearance of ignorance is unclear, as is the need for a philosophical diagnosis of it.
Keywords Keith DeRose  contextualism  skepticism  safety  sensitivity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/22105700-20191371
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Harvard University Press.
Compassionate Phenomenal Conservatism.Michael Huemer - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):30–55.
Solving the Skeptical Problem.Keith DeRose - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (1):1-52.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 431-433.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

In Conversation with the Skeptic: Contextualism and the Raising of Standards.Daniele Sgaravatti - 2013 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3 (2):97-118.
Modal Stability and Warrant.Colin P. Ruloff - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (2):173-188.
Contextualism, Skepticism, and Invariantism.Stephen Jacobson - 2010 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 14 (3):375-392.
Shiffer's Objections to DeRose's Contextualism.Smiljana Gartner - 2006 - Synthesis Philosophica 21 (1):81-94.
Skepticism and Objective Contexts: A Critique of DeRose.Giovanni Mion - 2013 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3 (2):119-129.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-06-17

Total views
128 ( #71,194 of 2,343,893 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #18,043 of 2,343,893 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes