In Christian ethics the Gospel story of the encounter of a rich young ruler with Jesus has been interpreted in two major ways: one that treats Jesus’ directive to the ruler as a counsel that goes beyond the commandments the ruler claims to have kept, and another that treats the directive as contained in the commandments and exposing his failure to keep them. I reconstruct Calvin’s version of the second interpretation, contrast it with Aquinas’s version of the first, and point out some problems with it. I then formulate a revised version that avoids the problems and amounts to a promising alternative for Christian ethics.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/jsce202051824
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,864
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Legal Advance of the Advance Directive.Stuart Hornett - 1994 - Ethics and Medicine: A Christian Perspective on Issues in Bioethics 10 (2):25.
Christian Ethics: Retrospect and Prospect.David P. Gushee - 2018 - Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 38 (2):3-20.


Added to PP index

Total views
2 ( #1,386,742 of 2,433,136 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #463,753 of 2,433,136 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes