The semantics of belief ascriptions
Noûs 33 (4):519-557 (1999)
Abstract
nated discussion of the semantics of such verbs. I will call this view.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1111/0029-4624.00192
My notes
Similar books and articles
A Problem with De Re Belief Ascriptions, with a Consequence to Substitutivity.Ari Maunu - 2002 - Philosophia 29 (1-4):411-421.
A formal model of multi-agent belief-interaction.John Cantwell - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (4):397-422.
Simple Sentences, Substitution, and Intuitions.Jennifer Mather Saul - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
761 (#11,124)
6 months
89 (#10,332)
2009-01-28
Downloads
761 (#11,124)
6 months
89 (#10,332)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
‘That’-Clauses and Non-nominal Quantification.Tobias Rosefeldt - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (3):301 - 333.
References found in this work
Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1975 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 47.
Logic and Conversation.H. P. Grice - 1975 - In Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds.), The Logic of Grammar. Encino, CA: pp. 64-75.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 2003 - In John Heil (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.
On sense and reference.Gottlob Frege - 1960 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing About Language. Routledge. pp. 36--56.