Exploitation and commercial surrogate motherhood

Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 7 (1):8--14 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Various authors, for instance Elizabeth Anderson, Rosemary Tong, Mary Warnock and Margaret Brazier have argued that commercial surrogate motherhood is exploitative and that it should be prohibited. Their arguments are unconvincing. Exploitation is a more complex notion than it is usually presented as being. Unequal bargaining power can be a cause of exploitation but the exercise of unequal bargaining power is not inevitably or inherently exploitative. Exploitation concerns unfair and/or unjust strategies - rather than the exercise of power as such. Commercial surrogate motherhood is not necessarily exploitative. Furthermore, not all transactions which are exploitative should be made illegal.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of Commercial Surrogate Mothering: A Response to Casey Humbyrd.Peter Omonzejele - 2011 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 17 (1):110-121.
Surrogate motherhood: beyond the Warnock and Brazier reports.Hugh V. McLachlan & J. Kim Swales - 2005 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 11 (1):12.
Paying organ donors.J. Harvey - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (3):117-119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-01-01

Downloads
170 (#117,992)

6 months
4 (#862,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Add more references