Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (6):415-416 (2019)

Authors
Abstract
Marquis’s account of the ethics of abortion is unsatisfactory but not as Christensen implies baseless. It requires to be amended rather than abandoned. It is true, as Marquis asserts that murder and abortion both might deprive people of something of value to them, in particular, the life of a sort that might have been to them worth living. However, it is mistaken to conclude, as Marquis does, that murder and abortion are thereby morally equivalent. Not all deprivation is wrongful. Not all that is wrongful is wrongful because it deprives someone of something. Contrary to what Christensen asserts, and Marquis seems to accept, it is not solely those discernible people who currently exist who might be deprived by our current actions. It is not only towards and concerning such living discernible people that we can have moral duties. It is not only such living discernible people who can be the beneficiaries of our generosity. Hence, contraception and the emission of greenhouse gases are, like abortion, issues that raise significant moral questions; however, they might each be properly answered. Nonetheless, it does not follow that is morally equivalent to each other far less than they are all morally equivalent to murder. If and when they are morally wrong, they can be different wrongs.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2019-105470
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,577
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Abortion and Deprivation: A Reply to Marquis.Anna Christensen - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (1):22-25.
Strong's Objections to the Future of Value Account.Don Marquis - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (6):384-388.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Abortion and the Epicurean Challenge.Karl Ekendahl - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (4):273-274.
Continuing Conversations About Abortion and Deprivation.Anna Christensen - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (4):275-276.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Abortion and Deprivation: A Reply to Marquis.Anna Christensen - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (1):22-25.
Abortion as Murder?: A Response.Jim Stone - 1995 - Journal of Social Philosophy 26 (1):129-146.
Can the Potentiality Argument Survive the Contraception Reduction?Phil Gosselin - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:437-458.
Future Harms and Current Offspring.Jason Kawall - 2011 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (1):23-26.
How Harmful Are the Average American's Greenhouse Gas Emissions?John Nolt - 2011 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (1):3-10.
The Parenthood Argument.William Simkulet - 2018 - Bioethics 32 (1):10-15.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-04-25

Total views
16 ( #641,076 of 2,446,604 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #310,336 of 2,446,604 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes