Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):865-867 (2012)

Authors
Jennifer A. McMahon
University of Adelaide
Abstract
Each chapter covers one topic and largely consists of brief summaries of arguments for and against various themes. The topic of the first chapter is whether and on what basis a film can be considered art. Photography is used as an analogy. The arguments range from considering the mechanical form of cinema as an obstacle to arthood to arguments considering cinema’s mechanical nature as essential to its arthood; the former by those who ground art in human agency, the latter by those who ground art in some conception of verisimilitude. Those worried by the former argument, emphasize editing and montage effects as the essential aspects of cinema, the idea being that the less representational veracity a film presented, the more it could be classified as art. On the other hand, for those who equate the art of film with verisimilitude, it is argued that the realism of film is superior to the realism of the other representational arts due to film’s retrieval of images as opposed to merely representing them.
Keywords film  realism  arthood
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phiq.2012.62.issue-249
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Happiness, Pleasures, and Emotions.Mauro Rossi - 2018 - Philosophical Psychology 31 (6):898-919.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Seeing Fictions in Film: The Epistemology of Movies by Wilson, George M.Katherine Thomson-Jones - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (4):393-394.
The Literary Origins of the Cinematic Narrator.Katherine Thomson-Jones - 2007 - British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (1):76-94.
The Philosophy of Motion Picturesby Carroll, Noël.Katherine Thomson-Jones - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (4):401-403.
Cinematic Narrators.Katherine Thomson-Jones - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (2):296-311.
The Philosophy of Film: Introductory Texts and Readings.K. Thomson-Jones - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (2):210-212.
A Philosophy of Cinematic Art – Berys Gaut.Katherine Thomson-Jones - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (243):445-446.
Narration in Motion.K. J. Thomson-Jones - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (1):33-43.
BeDevil.Raymond Aaron Younis - 1995 - In Scott Murray (ed.), Australian Film 1978-1994. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-09-04

Total views
292 ( #32,776 of 2,455,883 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #40,551 of 2,455,883 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes