Can Economists Speak for Farmed Animals?

Journal of Animal Ethics 3 (2):174-181 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Compassion, by the Pound is an excellent volume on the economics of animal agriculture. The authors’ analysis of animal welfare includes important contributions to the practice of cost-benefit analysis and a groundbreaking study of consumer preferences for more ethically produced animal products. Undergirding their economic analysis, however, is an inadequate engagement with animal ethics and economic ethics. This review highlights the strengths of this book and then considers three problems with the authors’ implicit ethical framework. This book highlights both the value and the difficulty of using standard economic methods to contribute to the field of animal ethics.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,805

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Popular Media and Animals.Claire Molloy - 2011 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Why Animals Can't Act.Ralf Stoecker - 2009 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 52 (3):255-271.
Why Animals Don’t Speak.Nicholas Wolterstorff - 1987 - Faith and Philosophy 4 (4):463-485.
What do economists analyze and why: Values or facts?Partha Dasgupta - 2005 - Economics and Philosophy 21 (2):221-278.


Added to PP

10 (#897,529)

6 months
1 (#482,368)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven McMullen
Hope College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references