Review of Making sense. A theory of interpretation [Book Review]
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (1):107 – 109 (2002)
Abstract
The distinctive feature of Thom’s theory of interpretation is that it takes the classicist view regarding the stability of the object of interpretation, and the post-structuralist view regarding what counts as interpretation. Accordingly, he must admit the possibility that any one object of interpretation, stable though it be, can have multiple (yet possibly incommensurable) successful interpretations.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1080/713659354
My notes
Similar books and articles
Number sense and quantifier interpretation.Robin Clark & Murray Grossman - 2007 - Topoi 26 (1):51--62.
Making sense: A theory of interpretation. [REVIEW]Peter Lamarque - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):80-84.
Enaction, Sense-Making and Emotion.Giovanna Colombetti - 2013 - In S. J. Gapenne & E. Di Paolo (eds.), Enaction: Towards a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. MIT Press.
Making sense of others: Donald Davidson on interpretation.William Taschek - 2002 - Harvard Review of Philosophy 10 (1):27-40.
On the “Gray’s Elegy” Argument and its Bearing on Frege’s Theory of Sense.James Levine - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):251–295.
Making Sense of Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy and Theory of Education and Teaching.David Carr - 2003 - Routledgefalmer.
Ambiguous Weighting and Nonsensical Sense: The Problems of “Balance” and “Common Sense” as Commonplace Concepts and Decision-making Heuristics in Environmental Rhetoric.Derek G. Ross - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (1):115-144.
In search of sense in common sense management.Joseph Z. Nitecki - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (8):639 - 647.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-05-07
Downloads
279 (#43,396)
6 months
9 (#95,605)
2010-05-07
Downloads
279 (#43,396)
6 months
9 (#95,605)
Historical graph of downloads