Serving the public and serving the market: A conflict of interest?

Journal of Mass Media Ethics 7 (4):196 – 208 (1992)
Abstract
If a news organization serves the market well, does it also serve the public well? Yes, say the leaders of the news industry, market forces improve journalism. This article uses market theory microeconomics to test the executives' assertion. The analysis concludes that news is a peculiar commodity, what economists call a "credence" good, that may invite fraud because consumers cannot readily determine its quality, even after consuming it. News, by definition, is what we don't yet know. The article also contends that advertisers seek public attention for their products rather than public education about current events. Thus advertiser-supported news media following market logic compete not in a news market, but in a larger market for public attention. This attention market may value entertainment more than information, leading to a conflict with journalism's norms of public service.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1207/s15327728jmme0704_1
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,133
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases.Manuel G. Velasquez - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (8):592-604.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Three Essays on Journalism and Virtue.G. Stuart Adam, Stephanie Craft & Elliot Cohen - 2004 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 19 (3):247-275.
Trust and the Economics of News.Bastiaan Vanacker & Genelle Belmas - 2009 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 24 (2 & 3):110 – 126.
Who's Responsible for Journalism?John H. McManus - 1997 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 12 (1):5 – 17.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
43 ( #124,002 of 2,191,835 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #95,146 of 2,191,835 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature