Perichoresis 18 (5):55-65 (2020)

Authors
Tyler McNabb
St. Francis University
Joseph Blado
University of Notre Dame
Abstract
C-Inductive arguments are arguments that increase the probability of a hypothesis. This can be contrasted with what is called a P-Inductive argument. A P-inductive argument is an argument that shows the overall probability of a hypothesis to be more probable than not. In this paper, we put forth a C-inductive argument for the truth of the Catholic hypothesis (CH). Roughly, we take CH to be the hypothesis that the core creedal beliefs found within the Catholic Tradition are true. Specifically, we argue that we would expect the Miracle of Fátima on CH, but, we wouldn’t expect it as much on ~CH. In order to establish this thesis, we first discuss the basics of confirmation theory. Second, we give the historical context of the Miracle of Fátima. Third, we briefly survey and then reject two possible non-supernatural explanations of the apparent miracle. Doing this will help make plausible that the Miracle of Fátima is actual evidence that a hypothesis needs to predict. Fourth, we give the details as to why we should expect the Miracle of Fátima more on CH than ~CH. Finally, we argue that miracles that occur in Protestant contexts, generally don’t carry the same evidential weight for a Protestant hypothesis as the Miracle of Fátima carries for CH.
Keywords Bayesianism  Analytic Theology  Catholicism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.2478/perc-2020-0028
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,259
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Existence of God.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
The Existence of God.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - Oxford University Press UK.
The Existence of God.Richard Swinburne - 1981 - Philosophical Quarterly 31 (122):85-88.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Deductive/Inductive Distinction.George Bowles - 1994 - Informal Logic 16 (3):159-184.
Probability and Hume's Inductive Scepticism.David Charles Stove - 1973 - Oxford, UK: Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Okasha on Inductive Scepticism.Marc Lange - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (207):226-232.
The Possibility of Inductive Moral Arguments.Mark T. Nelson - 2006 - Philosophical Papers 35 (2):231-246.
Explanation and the Cosmological Argument.Bruce Reichenbach - 2004 - In Michael Peterson & Raymond vanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. London: Blackwell. pp. 97-114.
A Pastor’s Kid Finds the Catholic Church.Logan Paul Gage - 2019 - In Brian Besong & Jonathan Fuqua (eds.), Faith and Reason: Philosophers Explain Their Turn to Catholicism. San Francisco: Ignatius Press. pp. 151-174.
An Argument By Stove Against Inductive Scepticism.Andrew Pickin - 2006 - Dissertation, University of Cambridge

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-07-23

Total views
80 ( #146,420 of 2,518,479 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #28,292 of 2,518,479 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes