Dissertation, Marquette University (2013)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
In this dissertation I examine the topics of ethics, religion, and their relationship in the work of Charles Taylor. I take Taylor's attempt to confront modern disenchantment by seeking a kind of re-enchantment as my guiding thread. Seeking re-enchantment means, first of all, defending an `engaged realist' account of strong evaluation, i.e., qualitative distinctions of value that are seen as normative for our desires. Secondly, it means overcoming self-enclosure and achieving self-transcendence, which I argue should be understood in terms of transcending a `lower' mode of selfhood for a `higher' one in concern for `strong goods'. One of the main issues that Taylor raises is whether re-enchantment requires theism for its full adequacy. He advances - often as `hunches' - controversial claims regarding the significance of theism for defending strong evaluative realism and for motivating an ethic of universal human concern. I seek to fill out his hunches in terms of a theistic teleological perspective that is centered on the `telos of communion'. I argue that such a view is important for overcoming the problem of what Bernard Williams calls the `radical contingency' of ethical beliefs, which seems to undermine their normative authority. However, I argue that if a non-theistic view of cosmic purpose can be regarded as a viable option, then it could also help to address this problem and support a kind of re-enchantment. Taylor also advances the controversial view that there is an ineradicable draw to `transcendence' in human life in connection to the quest for the meaning of life. Here he opposes certain mainstream theories of secularization that see it as a process involving the ineluctable fading away of the relevance of religion. I seek to fill out and defend Taylor's view in this matter. Besides providing a reading of Taylor's work as a whole and advancing further some of the issues he raises, I also examine his general evaluative framework based on his account of strong evaluation. In doing so I show how he provides a distinct and important perspective among contemporary moral philosophers
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory.Alasdair C. MacIntyre - 1983 - University of Notre Dame Press.
View all 296 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Re-Enchanting the World: An Interview with Charles Taylor.David Mcpherson & Charles Taylor - 2012 - Philosophy and Theology 24 (2):275-294.
Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question.Charles Taylor, James Tully & Daniel M. Weinstock (eds.) - 1994 - Cambridge University Press.
Identiteit en kwaliteit Van leven.A. W. Musschenga - 1994 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 56 (4):643 - 666.
Charles Taylor, Mikhail Epstein and ‘Minimal Religion’.Ian Fraser - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 77 (2):159-178.
Specters of the Nineteenth Century: Charles Taylor and the Problem of Historicism. [REVIEW]Peter Woodford - 2012 - Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (1):171-192.
Charles Taylor and Nicholas H. Smith on Human Constants and Transcendental Arguments. A Review. [REVIEW]Arto Laitinen - 2003 - SATS 4 (2):191-201.
To What Extent Must We Go Beyond Neo-Aristotelian Ethical Naturalism?David Mcpherson - 2012 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):627-654.
Another Philosopher-Citizen : The Political Philosophy of Charles Taylor.Ruth Abbey - 2011 - In Catherine H. Zuckert (ed.), Political Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: Authors and Arguments. Cambridge University Press.
Questions in Contemporary Medicine and the Philosophy of Charles Taylor: An Introduction.F. A. Carnevale & D. M. Weinstock - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):329-334.
WHAT IS IMMANENT IN JUDAISM? Transcending A Secular Age. [REVIEW]Martin Kavka - 2012 - Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (1):123-137.
Charles Taylor’s Nietzschean Predicament: A Dilemma More Self-Revealing Than Foreboding.Mark Redhead - 2001 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (6):81-106.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-09-03
Total views
37 ( #307,070 of 2,506,489 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,726 of 2,506,489 )
2015-09-03
Total views
37 ( #307,070 of 2,506,489 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,726 of 2,506,489 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads