Have underground radiation measurements refuted the Orch OR theory?

Physics of Life Reviews (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In [1] it is claimed that, based on radiation emission measurements described in [2], a certain “variant” of the Orch OR theory has been refuted. I agree with this claim. However, the significance of this result for Orch OR per se is unclear. After all, the refuted “variant” was never advocated by anyone, and it contradicts the views of Hameroff and Penrose (hereafter: HP) who invented Orch OR [3]. My aim is to get clear on this situation. I argue that it is indeed reasonable to speak of “variants” here. Orch OR is not a complete model of reality but a work in progress. At its core, it claims that wavefunction collapse is a real physical event that has something to do with gravity (“OR”) and that consciousness depends on orchestrated collapses in microtubules (“Orch”). There are many ways one could make these base ideas precise hence many “variants”. Furthermore, the ways that HP aim to make these ideas precise are radical and incomplete. If they don’t work out, Orch OR will need to fall back on another variant. Thus, I believe the significance of [1-2] for Orch OR is that it cuts out a small class of possible variants and leaves behind questions and challenges for the rest, including the variant preferred by HP.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Consciousness, Microtubules, & 'Orch OR': A 'Space-time Odyssey'.Stuart Hameroff - 2014 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 21 (3-4):126-153.


Added to PP

242 (#87,278)

6 months
93 (#55,487)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kelvin J. McQueen
Chapman University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references