Authors
Dan McShea
Duke University
Abstract
Wants, preferences, and cares are physical things or events, not ideas or propositions, and therefore no chain of pure logic can conclude with a want, preference, or care. It follows that no pure-logic machine will ever want, prefer, or care. And its behavior will never be driven in the way that deliberate human behavior is driven, in other words, it will not be motivated or goal directed. Therefore, if we want to simulate human-style interactions with the world, we will need to first understand the physical structure of goal-directed systems. I argue that all such systems share a common nested structure, consisting of a smaller entity that moves within and is driven by a larger field that contains it. In such systems, the smaller contained entity is directed by the field, but also moves to some degree independently of it, allowing the entity to deviate and return, to show the plasticity and persistence that is characteristic of goal direction. If all this is right, then human want-driven behavior probably involves a behavior-generating mechanism that is contained within a neural field of some kind. In principle, for goal directedness generally, the containment can be virtual, raising the possibility that want-driven behavior could be simulated in standard computational systems. But there are also reasons to believe that goal-direction works better when containment is also physical, suggesting that a new kind of hardware may be necessary.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.05.015
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,262
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Architecture of Complexity.Herbert A. Simon - 1962 - Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106.
Motivational and Emotional Controls of Cognition.Herbert A. Simon - 1967 - Psychological Review 74 (1):29-39.
The Ontology of Complex Systems: Levels of Organization, Perspectives, and Causal Thickets.William C. Wimsatt - 1994 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 20:207-274.
Complexity and Organization.William C. Wimsatt - 1972 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1972:67-86.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Wants and Lacks.Gareth B. Matthews & S. Marc Cohen - 1967 - Journal of Philosophy 64 (14):455-456.
Goal-Directed Systems.Frederick Ray Adams - 1982 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
The Neuroscience of Goal-Directed Behavior.Ajay B. Satpute, Kevin N. Ochsner & David Badre - 2012 - In Henk Aarts & Andrew J. Elliot (eds.), Goal-Directed Behavior. Psychology Press.
Nonlinear Neurodynamics of Intentionality.Walter J. Freeman - 1997 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 18 (2-3):291-304.
On the Self-Regulation of Behavior.Charles S. Carver - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
Goal-Directed Behavior.Henk Aarts & Andrew J. Elliot (eds.) - 2012 - Psychology Press.
Machine Consciousness: Cognitive and Kinaesthetic Imagination.Susan A. J. Stuart - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (7):141-153.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-16

Total views
31 ( #354,526 of 2,455,764 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,332 of 2,455,764 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes