Why women consent to surgery, even when they don't want to: a qualitative study

Clinical Ethics 1 (3):153-158 (2006)

Authors
Clinise Jackson
Grand Canyon University
Sheikha Jenae Carter Williams
University of Hertfordshire
Martin Woods
Massey University
Abstract
Although there has been critical analysis of how the informed consent process functions in relation to participation in research and particular ethical 'dilemmas', there has been little examination of consenting to more routine medical procedures. We report a qualitative study of 25 women who consented to surgery. Of these, nine were ambivalent or opposed to having an operation. When faced with a consent form, women's accounts suggest that they rarely do anything other than obey professionals' requests for a signature. An interactionist analysis suggests that women's capacity to act is reduced by the hospital structure of tacit, socially-imposed rules of conduct. Bourdieu's concepts of habitus, capital and symbolic power/violence show how the practical logic that women apply confers a 'sense of place' relative to professionals. Women experience deficits in capital that constrain their ability to exercise choice. This work demonstrates the weakness of the consent process as a safeguard of autonomy
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1258/147775006778246522
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,433
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
42 ( #193,558 of 2,255,408 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #57,789 of 2,255,408 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature