Contemporary Arguments for a Geometry of Visual Experience

European Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):408-430 (2011)
Abstract
Abstract: In this paper I consider recent attempts to establish that the geometry of visual experience is a spherical geometry. These attempts, offered by Gideon Yaffe, James van Cleve and Gordon Belot, follow Thomas Reid in arguing for an equivalency of a geometry of ‘visibles’ and spherical geometry. I argue that although the proposed equivalency is successfully established by the strongest form of the argument, this does not warrant any conclusion about the geometry of visual experience. I argue, firstly, that the resistance of this contemporary argument to empirical considerations counts against its plausibility. Moreover, I argue that the contemporary approach provides no compelling reason for supposing that the geometry offered as the geometry of ‘visibles’ is the correct geometrical description of visual experience
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0378.2009.00387.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,188
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
A Realism for Reid: Mediated but Direct.Rebecca Copenhaver - 2004 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):61 – 74.
The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason.P. F. Strawson - 1966 - Harper & Row, Barnes & Noble Import Division.
Thomas Reid's Geometry of Visibles.James Van Cleve - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (3):373-416.
Visual Geometry.Jim Hopkins - 1973 - Philosophical Review 82 (1):3-34.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Conventionalism in Reid's 'Geometry of Visibles'.E. Slowik - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (3):467-489.
Thomas Reid's Discovery of a Non-Euclidean Geometry.Norman Daniels - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 39 (2):219-234.
Reconsidering Reid's Geometry of Visibles.Gideon Yaffe - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):602-620.
Thomas Reid and Non-Euclidean Geometry.Amit Hagar - 2002 - Reid Studies 5 (2):54-64.
The Geometry of Visual Space.Robert French - 1987 - Noûs 21 (June):115-133.
Edmund Husserl on the Applicability of Formal Geometry.René Jagnow - 2006 - In Emily Carson & Renate Huber (eds.), Intuition and the Axiomatic Method. Springer. pp. 67-85.
Remarks on the Geometry of Visibles.Gordon Belot - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (213):581–586.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-10-22

Total downloads

54 ( #94,561 of 2,153,857 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #279,963 of 2,153,857 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums