Authors
Zach Weber
University of Otago
Toby Meadows
University of California, Irvine
Abstract
The Church-Turing Thesis is widely regarded as true, because of evidence that there is only one genuine notion of computation. By contrast, there are nowadays many different formal logics, and different corresponding foundational frameworks. Which ones can deliver a theory of computability? This question sets up a difficult challenge: the meanings of basic mathematical terms are not stable across frameworks. While it is easy to compare what different frameworks say, it is not so easy to compare what they mean. We argue for some minimal conditions that must be met if two frameworks are to be compared; if frameworks are radical enough, comparison becomes hopeless. Our aim is to clarify the dialectical situation in this bourgeoning area of research, shedding light on the nature of non-classical logic and the notion of computation alike.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,586
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic.David K. Lewis - 1968 - Journal of Philosophy 65 (5):113-126.
Relevant Logics and Their Rivals.Richard Sylvan & Ross Brady (eds.) - 1982 - Ridgeview Pub. Co..

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Against Reflective Equilibrium for Logical Theorizing.Jack Woods - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Logic 16 (7):319.
Logical Partisanhood.Jack Woods - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (5):1203-1224.
Intertranslatability, Theoretical Equivalence, and Perversion.Jack Woods - 2018 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):58-68.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Concrete Digital Computation: What Does It Take for a Physical System to Compute? [REVIEW]Nir Fresco - 2011 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20 (4):513-537.
Quantum Mechanics and Computation.Bart D’Hooghe & Jaroslaw Pykacz - 2004 - Foundations of Science 9 (4):387-404.
Transcending Turing Computability.B. J. Maclennan - 2003 - Minds and Machines 13 (1):3-22.
Computationalism.Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 1995 - Synthese 105 (3):303-17.
Computation and Hypercomputation.Mike Stannett - 2003 - Minds and Machines 13 (1):115-153.
On Implementing a Computation.David J. Chalmers - 1994 - Minds and Machines 4 (4):391-402.
SAD Computers and Two Versions of the Church–Turing Thesis.Tim Button - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):765-792.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-08-03

Total views
42 ( #229,768 of 2,348,666 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #120,371 of 2,348,666 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes