Impermissive Bayesianism

Erkenntnis (S6):1-33 (2013)
Abstract
This paper examines the debate between permissive and impermissive forms of Bayesianism. It briefly discusses some considerations that might be offered by both sides of the debate, and then replies to some new arguments in favor of impermissivism offered by Roger White. First, it argues that White’s (Oxford studies in epistemology, vol 3. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 161–186, 2010) defense of Indifference Principles is unsuccessful. Second, it contends that White’s (Philos Perspect 19:445–459, 2005) arguments against permissive views do not succeed
Keywords Bayesianism  Impermissivism  Uniqueness  White
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10670-013-9547-z
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1955 - Harvard University Press.
Writing the Book of the World.Theodore Sider - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News.David Christensen - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217.
Humean Supervenience Debugged.David Lewis - 1994 - Mind 103 (412):473--490.
Belief and the Will.Bas C. van Fraassen - 2010 - In Antony Eagle (ed.), Journal of Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 235-256.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Uniqueness Thesis.Matthew Kopec & Michael G. Titelbaum - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (4):189-200.
Immoderately Rational.Sophie Horowitz - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (1):41-56.
Probabilistic Promotion Revisited.Jeff Behrends & Joshua DiPaolo - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (7):1735-1754.
Conservatism and Uniqueness.Jaemin Jung - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (8):2233-2248.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
In Defence of Dogmatism.Luca Moretti - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (1):261-282.
Introduction: Bayesianism Into the 21st Century.Jon Williamson & David Corfield - 2001 - In David Corfield & Jon Williamson (eds.), Foundations of Bayesianism. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 1--16.
Plantinga e a justificação Bayesiana de crenças.Agnaldo Cuoco Portugal - 2012 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 57 (2):15-25.
Objective Bayesianism Defended?Darrell P. Rowbottom - 2012 - Metascience 21 (1):193-196.
Ramsey and the Measurement of Belief.Richard Bradley - 2001 - In David Corfield & Jon Williamson (eds.), Foundations of Bayesianism.
Bayesianism II: Applications and Criticisms.Kenny Easwaran - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (5):321-332.
Two Dogmas of Strong Objective Bayesianism.Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay & Gordon Brittan - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):45 – 65.
Synopsis.Synopsis Conference - forthcoming - British Journal of Aesthetics Advance Access:ayw061.
Added to PP index
2013-05-13

Total downloads
351 ( #8,469 of 2,197,286 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #3,112 of 2,197,286 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature