Journal of Business Ethics 12 (2):83 - 92 (1993)

Certain types of corporate charter antitakeover amendments, or shark repellents, may not serve the interests of the stockholders or the stakeholders of the firm. This paper extends the examination of the use of shark repellents by taking an ethical perspective to synthesize prior research on shark repellents and their relationship to stockholder and stakeholder welfare. Some shark repellents seem to benefit certain interest groups at the expense of other groups.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00871928
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Ethics of Greenmail.R. Edward Freeman, Daniel R. Gilbert & Carol Jacobson - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (3):165 - 178.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
18 ( #611,295 of 2,520,411 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,411 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes