Authors
José Medina
Vanderbilt University
Abstract
Through a new interpretation of Wittgenstein's rule-following discussions, this article defends a negotiating model of normativity according to which normative authority is always subject to contestation. To refute both individualism and collectivism, I supplement Wittgenstein's Private Language Argument with a Social Language Argument, showing that normativity cannot be monopolized either individually or socially (i.e. it cannot be privatized or collectivized). The negotiating view of normativity here developed lays the foundations of a politics of radical contestation which converges with Chantal Mouffe's framework of 'radical democracy', while departing from her agonism in preserving the structuring and constraining role that tacit agreement in action plays in rule-following practices. My account of the 'burdens of eccentricity' elucidates how the normative force of dissidence can be properly recognized and used effectively for social transformations. I argue that there is a 'presumption of normalcy' in favour of the established consensus of action, but that this presumption is defeasible: in normative disagreements, a violation of expected normalcy shifts the burden onto the shoulders of rebellious agents who must show that their dissenting behaviour can be a legitimate extension, revision, or transformation of the practice in question
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09672551003592227
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,972
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 47 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Participation and Membership in Discursive Practices.Kenneth Shockley - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (1):67-85.
Agonistic Critiques of Liberalism: Perfection and Emancipation.Thomas Fossen - 2008 - Contemporary Political Theory 7 (4):376–394.
Language and Power.Lynne Tirrell - 1997 - In Alison M. Jaggar & Iris Marion Young (eds.), A Companion to Feminist Philosophy,. Blackwell.
Is Solitary Rule-Following Possible?Jussi Haukioja - 2005 - Philosophia 32 (1-4):131-154.
Wittgenstein and Nonsense: Psychologism, Kantianism, and the Habitus.José Medina - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (3):293 – 318.
Social Practices and Normativity.Joseph Rouse - 2007 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (1):46-56.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-05-07

Total views
46 ( #218,250 of 2,410,110 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #541,624 of 2,410,110 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes