Interpretation and social science [Book Review]

Human Studies 20 (4):429-440 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2004

DOI

10.1023/a:1005353522994

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Action and interpretation: studies in the philosophy of the social sciences.Christopher Hookway & Philip Pettit (eds.) - 1977 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Is medicine a social science?Michael Martin - 1981 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (4):345-360.
Justifying Sociological Knowledge: From Realism to Interpretation.Isaac Reed - 2008 - Sociological Theory 26 (2):101-129.
Theories, practices, and pluralism: A pragmatic interpretation of critical social science.James Bohman - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (4):459-480.
'All this and so much more': Understanding interpretation between originalism and antagonism.G. P. - unknown
Can social science be just?John Gilbert Gunnell - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (4):595-621.
Interpretation in the natural sciences.Jan Faye - 2010 - In Dorato Mauro, Miklós Rédei & Mauricio Suárez (eds.), EPSA Epistemology and Methodology of Science. Launch of the European Philosophy of Sciences Association. Vol. 1-2. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 107-117.
Review: Interpretation and Social Science: A Review Essay of James Bohman's New Philosophy of Social Science. [REVIEW]Johanna Meehan - 1997 - Human Studies 20 (4):429 - 440.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
43 (#351,093)

6 months
7 (#339,156)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Johanna Meehan
Grinnell College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references