Neural models that convince: Model hierarchies and other strategies to bridge the gap between behavior and the brain
Philosophical Psychology 20 (6):749 – 772 (2007)
AbstractComputational modeling of the brain holds great promise as a bridge from brain to behavior. To fulfill this promise, however, it is not enough for models to be 'biologically plausible': models must be structurally accurate. Here, we analyze what this entails for so-called psychobiological models, models that address behavior as well as brain function in some detail. Structural accuracy may be supported by (1) a model's a priori plausibility, which comes from a reliance on evidence-based assumptions, (2) fitting existing data, and (3) the derivation of new predictions. All three sources of support require modelers to be explicit about the ontology of the model, and require the existence of data constraining the modeling. For situations in which such data are only sparsely available, we suggest a new approach. If several models are constructed that together form a hierarchy of models, higher-level models can be constrained by lower-level models, and low-level models can be constrained by behavioral features of the higher-level models. Modeling the same substrate at different levels of representation, as proposed here, thus has benefits that exceed the merits of each model in the hierarchy on its own.
Similar books and articles
Robots Aren't the Only Physical Models.Peter E. Midford - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1069-1070.
On Levels of Cognitive Modeling.Ron Sun, Andrew Coward & Michael J. Zenzen - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (5):613-637.
Is There More to “Model” Than “Muddle”?Matthias Scheutz - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1076-1077.
The Dynamical Model is a Perceptron.Bruce Bridgeman - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):631-632.
The Nature and Function of Models.Ronald N. Giere - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1060-1060.
Dimensionality and Explanatory Power of Reading Models.Douglas Hanes & Gin McCollum - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):486-487.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Sculpting the Space of Actions. Explaining Human Action by Integrating Intentions and Mechanisms.Machiel Keestra - 2014 - Dissertation, University of Amsterdam
References found in this work
Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science.Carl Gustav Hempel - 1965 - New York: The Free Press.