Authors
Jason Megill
Bentley College
Dan Linford
Purdue University
Abstract
We first argue that there are cases of “blameless non-belief.” That is, some people—through no fault of their own—fail to enter into a conscious relationship with God. But if so, then it would be unjust of God to make certain particular goods depend upon one having a conscious relationship with God. So, given that God is just, then despite what some theists believe, a relationship with God cannot be a necessary condition for the attainment of these goods; there might, e.g., be atheists in heaven, even assuming that theism is true. This implies that religion is a far less important component of people’s lives than many might think.
Keywords God  divine hiddenness  religious epistemology  religious pluralism  soteriology  the meaning of life  theology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1558/eph.33854
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-10-25

Total views
598 ( #13,433 of 2,498,128 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #29,159 of 2,498,128 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes