Authors
Samuel Meister
University of Toronto, St. George Campus
Abstract
Aristotle analyses a large range of objects as composites of matter and form. But how exactly should we understand the relation between the matter and form of a composite? Some commentators have argued that forms themselves are somehow material, that is, forms are impure. Others have denied that claim and argued for the purity of forms. In this paper, I develop a new purist interpretation of Metaphysics Z.10-11, a text central to the debate, which I call 'hierarchical purism'. I argue that hierarchical purism can overcome the difficulties faced by previous versions of purism as well as by impurism. Roughly, on hierarchical purism, each composite can be considered and defined in two different ways: From the perspective of metaphysics, composites are considered only insofar as they have forms and defined purely formally. From the perspective of physics, composites are considered insofar as they have forms and matter and defined with reference to both. Moreover, while the metaphysical definition is a definition in the strict sense of 'definition', the physical definition is a definition in a loose sense. Analogous points hold for intelligible composites and geometry. Finally, neither sort of definitional practice implies that, for Aristotle, forms are impure.
Keywords Aristotle  Metaphysics  Hylomorphism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2020
DOI 10.3998/ergo.12405314.0007.001
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Aristotle's First Principles.Terence Irwin - 1988 - Oxford University Press.
Aristotle on Geometrical Objects.Ian Mueller - 1970 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 52 (2):156-171.
Form and Individuation in Aristotle.Jennifer E. Whiting - 1986 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 3 (4):359 - 377.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Individual Forms in Aristotle.Jennifer Elaine Whiting - 1984 - Dissertation, Cornell University
Does Aristotle Have a Theory of Art?Lok Hoe - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (2).
Aristotle Metaphysics. Aristotle - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
Metaphysics H 6 and the Problem of Unity.Hye-Kyung Kim - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (1):25-42.
Substance and Predication in Aristotle.Gareth B. Matthews - 1993 - Review of Metaphysics 46 (3):624-625.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-02-13

Total views
96 ( #107,889 of 2,432,741 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #20,178 of 2,432,741 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes