Medicine Studies 1 (4):353-366 (2009)
Between 1935 and 1970, tens of thousands of people worldwide underwent brain operations due to psychiatric indication that were intended to positively influence their mental state and behaviour. The majority of these psychosurgical procedures were prefrontal lobotomies. Developed in 1935, the procedure initially met with fierce opposition, but was introduced in numerous countries in the following decade, and was employed up until the late 1960s. This article investigates why psychosurgery was widely accepted after World War II. It examines the effects it was hoped psychosurgical intervention would have, the undesired outcomes in which the method could potentially result, and the significance these outcomes were given. The analysis of scientific articles of the period as well as one case study show that the goal of the operation was, first and foremost, to help the mentally ill adapt to the social order inside and outside the mental institution. After initial criticism, changes in personality, severe physical side-effects and death were accepted in order to reach this goal. Thus, with psychosurgical intervention the social adjustment of patients, also in their own interest, was rated higher than physical and psychic integrity. This widely held view shows that after World War II a post-bourgeoise order of the subject dominated, according to which an individual was to adapt and to function in the interests of the collective. According to the assumption, the triumph of lobotomy was related to the development of a new conception of the self that made possible a broad implementation of the procedure and that was consolidated through psychosurgery
|Keywords||Conception of the self History Lobotomy Psychiatry Psychosurgery Social adjustment|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Ethical Issues in Psychosurgery.John Kleinig & Jennifer Radden - 1987 - Philosophy 62 (239):106-108.
Justification et résultats d'une psychochirurgie.Pierre Wertheimer - 1951 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 141:337 - 351.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Gold-Plated Leucotomy Standard and Deep Brain Stimulation.Grant Gillett - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (1):35-44.
How War Affects People: Lessons From Euripides.David K. Chan - 2006 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):1-5.
Hitler's War and the Germans. Mood and Attitude of the German People During the Second World War.Ernest K. Bramsted - 1972 - Philosophy and History 5 (1):106-108.
Global Peace as a Professional Concern, I.Thomas L. Perry - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (2-3):167 - 171.
The Collective Responsibility of Democratic Publics.Avia Pasternak - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):99-123.
The Empire of Chance: War, Literature, and the Epistemic Order of Modernity.Anders Engberg-Pedersen - unknown
Defining War for the 21st Century.Steven Metz & Phillip R. Cuccia (eds.) - 2011 - Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
War and Peace in Jewish Tradition: From the Biblical World to the Present.Yigal Levin & Amnon Shapira (eds.) - 2011 - Routledge.
Disputes in Just War Theory and Meta-Theory.G. Long - 2012 - European Journal of Political Theory 11 (2):209-225.
War and Peace in Jewish Tradition: From the Biblical World to the Present: The Third Annual Conference of the Israel Heritage Department Ariel, Israel.Yigal Levin & Amnon Shapira (eds.) - 2012 - Routledge.
Perceived Hereditary Effect of World War I: A Study of the Positions of Friedrich von Bernhardi and Vernon Kellogg. [REVIEW]Matthis Krischel - 2010 - Medicine Studies 2 (2):139-150.
Lesser Evil and Responsibility: Comments on Jeff McMahan's Analysis of the Morality of War.Re'em Segev - 2007 - Israel Law Review 40 (3):709-729.
Added to index2011-11-26
Total downloads8 ( #495,913 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,488 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?