From Plato to Frege: Paradigms of Predication in the History of Ideas [Book Review]

Metaphysica 10 (2):199-214 (2009)
Abstract
One of the perennial questions of philosophy concerns the simple statements which say that an object is so and so or that such and such objects are so and so related: simple predicative statements. Do such statements have an ontological basis, and if so, what is that basis? The answer to this question determines—or in any case, is expressive of—a specific fundamental outlook on the world. In the course of the history of Western philosophy, various philosophers have given various answers to the question of predication. This essay presents the main, crucial answers: the paradigms and theories of predication of the Sophists (and of all later radical relativists), of Plato, of Aristotle, of the Aristotelian-minded non-nominalists, of Leibniz, and of Frege. In addition, the essay follows (to some extent) the most influential—the Aristotelian or mereological—paradigm of predication in its continuity and modification through the many centuries of its reign. However, the essay is not content to adopt the merely historical point of view; it also poses the question of adequacy. Prior to Frege, there was no philosophically adequate theory of predication, and the essay points out the shortcomings (besides aspects that can be viewed as advantages) of each pre-Fregean predication theory considered in it. Frege, in the nineteenth century, brought the philosophy of predication on the right track, but his own theory of predication has its own deficits. The essay ends with the presentation of a theory of predication that the author himself considers adequate.
Keywords Predication  Plato  Aristotle  Leibniz  Frege
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12133-009-0051-5
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,204
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Parts of Forms. An Essay Concerning Plato's Parmenides.Kutschera Franz von - 1998 - Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 1:57-74.
Negative Theology, Coincidentia Oppositorum, and Boolean Algebra.Uwe Meixner - 1998 - Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 1:75-89.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-13

Total downloads

81 ( #64,120 of 2,164,237 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #84,020 of 2,164,237 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums