Metaphysica 10 (2):199-214 (2009)
AbstractOne of the perennial questions of philosophy concerns the simple statements which say that an object is so and so or that such and such objects are so and so related: simple predicative statements. Do such statements have an ontological basis, and if so, what is that basis? The answer to this question determinesâor in any case, is expressive ofâa specific fundamental outlook on the world. In the course of the history of Western philosophy, various philosophers have given various answers to the question of predication. This essay presents the main, crucial answers: the paradigms and theories of predication of the Sophists (and of all later radical relativists), of Plato, of Aristotle, of the Aristotelian-minded non-nominalists, of Leibniz, and of Frege. In addition, the essay follows (to some extent) the most influentialâthe Aristotelian or mereologicalâparadigm of predication in its continuity and modification through the many centuries of its reign. However, the essay is not content to adopt the merely historical point of view; it also poses the question of adequacy. Prior to Frege, there was no philosophically adequate theory of predication, and the essay points out the shortcomings (besides aspects that can be viewed as advantages) of each pre-Fregean predication theory considered in it. Frege, in the nineteenth century, brought the philosophy of predication on the right track, but his own theory of predication has its own deficits. The essay ends with the presentation of a theory of predication that the author himself considers adequate.
Similar books and articles
Frege's Theory of Predication: An Elaboration and Defense, with Some New Applications.Ian Rumfitt - 1994 - Philosophical Review 103 (4):599-637.
Plato on the Self-Predication of Forms: Early and Middle Dialogues.John Malcolm - 1991 - Oxford University Press.
Aristotelian Predication, Augustine and the Trinity.George Rudebusch - 1989 - The Thomist 53 (4):587 - 597.
A Subject-Comment Account of Predication.Bo Mou - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:167-191.
Non-Traditional Squares of Predication and Quantification.Mireille Staschok - 2008 - Logica Universalis 2 (1):77-85.
A Theistic Argument Against Platonism (and in Support of Truthmakers and Divine Simplicity).Michael Bergmann & Jeffrey E. Brower - 2006 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 2:357-386.
Kant and Frege on Existence and the Ontological Argument.Michael E. Cuffaro - 2012 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (4):337-354.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
THE TRANSCENDENTAL METAPHYSIC OF G.F. STOUT: HIS DEFENCE AND ELABORATION OF TROPE THEORY.Fraser Macbride - 2014 - In A. Reboul (ed.), Mind, Value and Metaphysics: Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan. Springer. pp. 141-58.
References found in this work
Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity.Judith Butler - 1989 - Routledge.
Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity.Judith Butler - 1990 - Routledge.