Frontiers of Philosophy in China 12 (2):207-223 (2017)

Authors
Bo R. Meinertsen
University of Sheffield
Abstract
This paper asks what should be the basis of a global environmental ethics. As Gao Shan has argued, the environmental ethics of Western philosophers such as Holmes Rolston and Paul Taylor is based on extending the notion of intrinsic value to that of objects of nature, and as such it is not very compatible with Chinese ethics. This is related to Gao’s rejection of most—if not all—Western “rationalist” environmental ethics, a stance that I grant her for pragmatic reasons (though I remain neutral about it theoretically). Gao argues that the Daoist notion of living in harmony with nature can instead become the basis of a Chinese environmental ethics. However, the involved Daoist conception of living in harmony with nature is, in my view, based on an aesthetic property. The paper argues that despite the appeal of the Daoist view for a Chinese environmental ethics, an aesthetic property cannot provide the basis for a global environmental ethics. The paper also considers another version of Daoist environmental ethics, which does not rely on an aesthetic notion, but I argue that it too fails as such a candidate. As an alternative, the paper considers and applies contemporary Western thinkers on gratitude (such as Robert Emmons and Elizabeth Loder), proposing that gratitude to nature (environmental gratitude) can indeed provide the needed basis.
Keywords global environmental ethics  rationalist  Daoism  aesthetic  subjective properties  gratitude
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy.Wing-Tsit Chan - 1963 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement. A Summary.Arne Naess - 1973 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 16 (1-4):95 – 100.
Non-Relative Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach.Martha C. Nussbaum - 1988 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 13 (1):32-53.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Metaphysics for Responsibility to Nature.Bo Meinertsen - 2018 - Journal of Value Inquiry 52 (2):187-197.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Gratitude to Nature.Tony Manela - 2018 - Environmental Values 27 (6):623-644.
An African Understanding of Environmental Ethics.Philomena A. Ojomo - 2010 - Thought and Practice: A Journal of the Philosophical Association of Kenya 2 (2):49-63.
Environmental Ethics From the Japanese Perspective.Midori Kagawa-Fox - 2010 - Ethics, Place and Environment 13 (1):57 – 73.
Aesthetic Regard for Nature in Environmental and Land Art.Emily Brady - 2007 - Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (3):287 – 300.
Environmental Ethics and Life.John Chuang - 2005 - Philosophy and Culture 32 (6):69-87.
Rorty and Postmodern Environmental Ethics.Robert Hood - 1998 - Environmental Ethics 20 (2):183-193.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-08-21

Total views
132 ( #87,279 of 2,498,529 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #22,155 of 2,498,529 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes