Pragmatics and Cognition 26 (1):61-84 (2019)

Abstract
The notion of an indirect speech act is at the very heart of cognitive pragmatics, yet, after nearly 50 years of orthodox speech act theory, it remains largely unclear how this notion can be explicated in a proper way. In recent years, two debates about indirect speech acts have stood out. First, a debate about the Searlean idea that indirect speech acts constitute a simultaneous realization of a secondary and a primary act. Second, a debate about the reasons for the use of indirect speech acts, in particular about whether this reason is to be seen in strategic advantages and/or observation of politeness demands. In these debates, the original pragmatic conception of sentence types as indicators of illocutionary force seems to have been getting lost. Here, I go back to the seemingly outdated “literal force hypothesis” and point out how it is still relevant for cognitive pragmatics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1075/pc.19009.mei
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,274
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

How Performatives Work.John R. Searle - 1989 - Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (5):535 - 558.
Performatives Are Statements Too.Kent Bach - 1975 - Philosophical Studies 28 (4):229 - 236.
Imperatives.C. L. Hamblin - 1988 - Mind 97 (388):624-626.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Indirect Speech Acts.Nicholas Asher & Alex Lascarides - 2001 - Synthese 128 (1):183-228.
Indirect Speech Acts.Nicholas Asher & Alex Lascarides - 2001 - Synthese 128 (1-2):183 - 228.
On the Arguments for Indirect Speech Acts.Rod Bertolet - 2017 - Philosophia 45 (2):533-540.
The Rhetorical Relations Approach to Indirect Speech Acts.Lenny Clapp - 2009 - Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (1):43-76.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-03-29

Total views
20 ( #536,428 of 2,448,642 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #179,444 of 2,448,642 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes