Philosophical Studies 52 (3):309-329 (1987)

Authors
Alfred Mele
Florida State University
Abstract
What is it, precisely, that an agent intends when he intends, as we might say, to clean his stove today? What is the content of his intention? In recent years, Gilbert Harman and John Searle have maintained that all intentions are self-referential -- that is, that an adequate expression of the content of any intention makes essential reference to the intention whose content is being expressed. I shall call this the self-referentiality thesis (SRT). Harman, in his paper 'Practical Reasoning', argues that "the intention to do A is the intention that, because of that very intention, one will do A". Searle, in his book, Intentionality, contends similarly that the "Intentional content" of an agent's "prior intention" to A identifies that very intention as a cause of the agent's (prospective) A-ing. In Sections 1-3 below, I show that the main arguments for the SRT are unsuccessful and that the thesis is problematic. In Section 4, I sketch an alternative account of the contents of intentions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00354051
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,661
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Intentionality.John Searle - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
Intentionality.John R. Searle - 1984 - Philosophy 59 (229):417-418.
A Theory of Human Action.Alvin I. Goldman - 1970 - Princeton University Press.
Rational Animals.Donald Davidson - 1982 - Dialectica 36 (4):317-28.
Intending and Acting.Jennifer Hornsby & Myles Brand - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (2):261.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Can I Only Intend My Own Actions?Luca Ferrero - 2013 - In David Shoemaker (ed.), Oxford Studies in Action and Responsibility. Oxford University Press. pp. (1) 70-94.
Meaning and Mindreading.J. Robert Thompson - 2014 - Mind and Language 29 (2):167-200.
The Role of Intention in Intentional Action.Frederick Adams & Alfred Mele - 1989 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19 (4):511 - 531.
The Benefits of Rule Following: A New Account of the Evolution of Desires.Armin W. Schulz - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):595-603.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Motivational Strength of Intentions.Renée Bilodeau - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 9:129-135.
The Intentionality of Intention and Action.John R. Searle - 1979 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):253 – 280.
The Semantic Insignificance of Referential Intentions.Vojislav Bozickovic - 2001 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):125-135.
Intention and Teleology.Matthew Hanser - 1998 - Mind 107 (426):381-401.
The Content of Intentions.Elisabeth Pacherie - 2000 - Mind and Language 15 (4):400-432.
Reasons and Intentions.Bruno Verbeek (ed.) - 2007 - Ashgate.
Taking on Intentions.Chrisoula Andreou - 2009 - Ratio 22 (2):157-169.
We-Intentions Revisited.Raimo Tuomela - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 125 (3):327 - 369.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
79 ( #118,865 of 2,340,041 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #189,616 of 2,340,041 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes