DNR and ECMO: A Paradox Worth Exploring

Journal of Clinical Ethics 25 (1):13-19 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides continuous circulation and/or oxygenation to adults with cardiac failure, pulmonary dysfunction, or both. The technology is similar to the traditional heart-lung bypass machines used during surgical procedures, however ECMO may be used outside the confines of the operating room and for extended periods of time. This paper explores the complexities, both clinical and ethical, of a donot-resuscitate (DNR) order for patients with cardiopulmonary failure on veno-arterial (VA-ECMO), a type of ECMO that provides resuscitation superior to the chest compressions that DNR is intended to prevent. Clinically, a DNR order has limited utility for patients on VA-ECMO and its presence can serve to create confusion. Symbolically, however, the designation may serve as a stepping-stone for surrogates facing difficult end-of-life decisions. The paper concludes by suggesting that it is prudent to avoid DNR discussions in the context of VA-ECMO.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ecmo.D. Elbourne, A. Grant & D. Field - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (2):127-127.
Deconstructing DNR.B. D. Gelbman & J. M. Gelbman - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):640-641.
Why There’s No Cause to Randomize.John Worrall - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3):451-488.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
12 (#1,058,801)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph Fins
Cornell University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references