Revising Anthropocentrism of Technics in the Light of the 21st Century New Anthropological Models

Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 21:72-83 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

_Purpose._ To substantiate the definition of technics as the attributive characteristics of a human being and the necessity of its orientation towards human flourishing in the context of new anthropological models of the 21st century. _Theoretical basis._ Correlation between technics, technology and the human essence is examined. The role of technics is traced at different historical stages of human development. Negative and positive effects of digital technology development upon a contemporary human being is analysed in the light of new anthropological models: homo technologicus, homo digitalis and homo eudaimonicus. The content of a new worldview-value paradigm of defining goals of technology is outlined. _Originality._ Transformation of the role of technics correlates with value and worldview shifts in person’s understanding of his/her purpose in both natural and social worlds. Nowadays, philosophical analysis of anthropological dimension of technics and technology opens a horizon for seeking effective solutions in the face of the contemporary challenges and anti-utopian threats by means of focusing on the fact that, indeed, technological development is subordinate to the humanist goal that is flourishing, wellbeing and comprehensive development of a human being. _Conclusions._ The essence of technology reveals not through its functional but anthropogenic definitions in a sense of a source of institutionalization and in a sense of a source of realization of a human way of self-identification and self-objectification of human subjectivity. Technics/technology is the attributive characteristics of human essence and being: a human being is as much human as much he/she is a creator of technics. The purpose of technics is not to master the nature and to transform the world; technics is, above all, a tool of human self-improvement and self-creation through broadening the horizon of human capacities. The analysis of new modern anthropological models shows that it is the orientation of technology/technology towards human flourishing that is, on the one hand, a response to the existential demands of modern man, and on the other hand, a way of preventing future threats related to technological development.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Three Types of Anthropocentrism.Ben Mylius - 2018 - Environmental Philosophy 15 (2):159-194.
Anthropocentrism: A Misunderstood Problem.Tim Hayward - 1997 - Environmental Values 6 (1):49 - 63.
Anthropological theory today.Henrietta L. Moore (ed.) - 1999 - Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Human Rights and New Horizons? Thoughts toward a New Juridical Ontology.Anna Grear - 2018 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 43 (1):129-145.
5. Technics, or the Fading Away of Aesthetics: The Sensible and the Question of Kant.Serge Trottein - 2013 - In Christina Howells & Gerald Moore (eds.), Stiegler and Technics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 87-101.
Introduction: Philosophy – The Repression of Technics.Christina Howells & Gerald Moore - 2013 - In Christina Howells & Gerald Moore (eds.), Stiegler and Technics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 1-14.
Toward a weak anthropocentrism.Stephen H. Webb - 2014 - Zygon 49 (3):761-763.
3. Of a Mythical Philosophical Anthropology: The Transcendental and the Empirical in Technics and Time.Michael Lewis - 2013 - In Christina Howells & Gerald Moore (eds.), Stiegler and Technics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 53-68.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-30

Downloads
10 (#1,165,120)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Dialectic of enlightenment: philosophical fragments.Max Horkheimer - 2002 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Edited by Theodor W. Adorno & Gunzelin Schmid Noerr.
Transformation of the Human Image in the Paradigm of Knowledge Evolution.V. H. Kremen & V. V. Ilin - 2021 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 19:5-14.
Technology as an Aspect of Human Praxis.Laszlo Ropolyi - 2019 - In Mihaly Heder & Eszter Nadasi (eds.), Essays in Post-Critical Philosophy of Technology. Wilmington, Delaware: Vernon Press. pp. 19-31.
Human Evolution: the Limits of Technocentrism.M. I. Boichenko - 2021 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 19:15-22.

View all 10 references / Add more references