Rescuing Frankfurt-style cases

Philosophical Review 107 (1):97-112 (1998)
Abstract
Almost thirty years ago, in an attempt to undermine what he termed "the principle of alternate possibilities" (the thesis that people are morally responsible for what they have done only if they could have done otherwise), Harry Frankfurt offered an ingenious thought-experiment that has played a major role in subsequent work on moral responsibility and free will. Several philosophers, including David Widerker and Robert Kane, argued recently that this thought-experiment and others like it are fundamentally flawed. This paper develops a new Frankfurt-style example that is immune to their objections. [Reprinted in Laura Waddell Ekstrom, ed., Agency and Responsibility: Essays on the Metaphysics of Freedom (Westview Press, 2001), pp. 241-54; and in John Martin Fischer, ed., Free Will, Vol. III (Routledge, 2005), pp. 330-42.]
Keywords Epistemology  Experiment  Moral Theory  Responsibility  Thought  Frankfurt, H
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2998316
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,662
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Reasons and Impossibility.Bart Streumer - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 136 (3):351-384.

View all 53 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

194 ( #20,618 of 2,143,766 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

10 ( #75,372 of 2,143,766 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums