The state, human rights and the ethics of war termination: what should a just peace look like? A critical appraisal

Journal of Global Ethics 7 (3):241-249 (2011)
Abstract
The concept of jus post bellum deals with moral considerations in the aftermath of conflict and is concerned with how a just peace should look like. This paper analyses the concept of jus post bellum as developed by contemporary Just War theorists. Its aim is to provide a critical perspective on the proposed substantial scope of this concept. In other words, it will consider the question: in restoring peace after war, is it justified for just combatants to change the political structure of a defeated aggressor? The piece will be divided into two main parts. First, through a review of the literature, I define the current state of the art on jus post bellum thinking in relation to a number of key aspects of this concept. What does241 it entail? Which principles is it made of? What sort of activities do just war theorists speak about when they speak of creating a just peace? Second, I focus on the principle of ?political rehabilitation? of the defeated state: is it permissible? Under what circumstances? While considering these questions and authors' views on this matter, the paper will provide a critical reappraisal of the current debate on the justifiability of political reconstruction in post-conflict states.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/17449626.2011.635686
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,756
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Morality of War.Brian Orend - 2006 - Broadview Press.
Jus Ex Bello.Darrel Mollendorf - 2008 - Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (2):123–136.
Jus Post Bellum.Brian Orend - 2000 - Journal of Social Philosophy 31 (1):117–137.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Kant's Ethics of War and Peace.Brian Orend - 2004 - Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):161-177.
Moral Responsibilities and the Conflicting Demands of Jus Post Bellum.Mark Evans - 2009 - Ethics and International Affairs 23 (2):147-164.
Scepticism About Jus Post Bellum.Seth Lazar - 2012 - In Larry May & Andrew Forcehimes (eds.), Morality, Jus Post Bellum, and International Law. Cambridge University Press.
Just War, Democracy, Democratic Peace.M. Evans - 2012 - European Journal of Political Theory 11 (2):191-208.
After War Ends: A Philosophical Perspective.Larry May - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
The Ethics of Killing in War.Jeff McMahan - 2004 - Ethics 114 (4):693-733.
Ethics and US Af-Pak Policy.Eric Patterson - 2010 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):31-46.
The Just War Tradition and its Modern Legacy: Jus Ad Bellum and Jus in Bello.D. Boucher - 2012 - European Journal of Political Theory 11 (2):92-111.
The Incoherence of Walzer's Just War Theory.Graham Parsons - 2012 - Social Theory and Practice 38 (4):663-88.
Jus Ad Bellum After 9/11: A State of the Art Report.Mark Rigstad - 2007 - International Political Theory Beacon.
Just War Theory and Cyber-Attacks.Leonard Kahn - 2013 - In Fritz Alhoff, Nicholas Evans & Adam Henschke (eds.), Not Just Wars. Routledge.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-12-17

Total downloads

26 ( #198,130 of 2,177,852 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #317,245 of 2,177,852 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums