A further analysis of Zhu Xi's theory of mind

Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (3):377-395 (2010)
Mind was the oneness of form and function. The change from an old theory to a new one about zhong 中 (the mean) and he 和 (harmony) was a shift from the idea of the separate form of nature and function of mind to one about both form and function of mind. Form was both the form of the spirit of the mind and of the substantiality of nature (not the same as substantial realities in substantialism); it was the integration of vacancy and substantiality, the integration of mind and nature. In contrast, function meant both feelings and perceiving action. It was infeasible to interpret function without reference to form; likewise, it was impractical to talk about perception without mentioning nature. On the other hand, a knower represented nature through concrete things and his actions, and a perceiver enlightened himself, realizing the self-consciousness of nature as a whole. Mind, nature, and perception could be interpreted as a whole, and these three could be separated too. Viewed in general, mind, nature, and principles were oneness; observed separately, nature differed with principles: nature meant principles, but perception was the quintessence of qi. The unfolding of perception, however, had its independence, and could be easily influenced by qi; thus, it was necessary to transform and cultivate qi-related temperament. Realistically, a man needs to face up to himself and to transform himself, and this sentiment is inspiring for today.
Keywords Mind  form and function  nature  perception  interpretation from a holistic point of view  interpretation from an atomistic point of view
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11466-010-0104-4
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,520
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Mind and Natural theory of Nong Am, Chang-hyup Kim and its Influence on Nak School.Cheon-Sung Lee - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 9:267-277.
Descartes and Malebranche on Thought, Sensation and the Nature of the Mind.Antonia Lolordo - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):387-402.
Evolution At the Surface of Euclid:Elements of A Long Infinity in Motion Along Space.Marvin E. Kirsh - 2011 - International Journal of the Arts and Sciences 4 (2):71-96.
A Discussion of the Mind-Brain Problem.K. R. Popper, B. I. B. Lindahl & P. Århem - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine 14 (2):167-180.
朝鮮性理學의 普遍性과 特殊性.Young-Jin Choi - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 9:195-205.
Augustine on the Mind's Search for Itself.Gareth B. Matthews - 2003 - Faith and Philosophy 20 (4):415-429.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
19 ( #263,298 of 2,180,841 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,822 of 2,180,841 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums