Knowledge representation, the World Wide Web, and the evolution of logic

Synthese 182 (2):269-295 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


It is almost universally acknowledged that first-order logic (FOL), with its clean, well-understood syntax and semantics, allows for the clear expression of philosophical arguments and ideas. Indeed, an argument or philosophical theory rendered in FOL is perhaps the cleanest example there is of “representing philosophy”. A number of prominent syntactic and semantic properties of FOL reflect metaphysical presuppositions that stem from its Fregean origins, particularly the idea of an inviolable divide between concept and object. These presuppositions, taken at face value, reflect a significant metaphysical viewpoint, one that can in fact hinder or prejudice the representation of philosophical ideas and arguments. Philosophers have of course noticed this and have, accordingly, sought to alter or extend traditional FOL in novel ways to reflect a more flexible and egalitarian metaphysical standpoint. The purpose of this paper, however, is to document and discuss how similar “adaptations” to FOL—culminating in a standardized framework known as Common Logic —have evolved out of the more practical and applied encounter of FOL with the problem of representing, sharing, and reasoning upon information on the World Wide Web.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,273

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sense and Reference on the Web.Harry Halpin - 2011 - Minds and Machines 21 (2):153-178.
Philosophy and the world wide web.Edward N. Zalta - 1995 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Computer Use in Philosophy 94 (2):29-33.
Designing visual languages for description logics.Brian R. Gaines - 2009 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 18 (2):217-250.
Agency and the Semantic Web.Christopher Walton - 2006 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
SCL: A Logic Standard for Semantic Integration.Christopher Menzel & Patrick Hayes - 2003 - Semantic Integration, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 82 (2003).
Informal Logic.Leo Groarke - 1996 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A sense-based, process model of belief.Robert F. Hadley - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (3):279-320.


Added to PP

214 (#76,273)

6 months
4 (#244,000)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Menzel
Texas A&M University

Citations of this work

Toward a Philosophy of The Web.Alexandre Monnin & Harry Halpin - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (4):361-379.
Conceptual frames revisited.Pawel Garbacz - 2015 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 25 (4):287-307.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Action, Emotion And Will.Anthony Kenny - 1963 - Ny: Humanities Press.
Quality and concept.George Bealer - 1982 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Semantics and property theory.Gennaro Chierchia & Raymond Turner - 1988 - Linguistics and Philosophy 11 (3):261 - 302.
Description Logic Handbook.Franz Baader (ed.) - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references