The most notable and recent comparative studies of Mozi have classified the ancient Chinese philosopher as a divine command theorist and consequentialist. In reconsidering this controversial debate, this paper finds that Mozi, in fact, meets the qualifications of classical utilitarianism and, in fact, may even espouse a proto-rule-utilitarian theory of ethics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Understanding Mozi's Foundations of Morality: A Comparative Perspective.Xiufen Lu - 2006 - Asian Philosophy 16 (2):123-134.
Is Mozi a Utilitarian Philosopher?Hao Changchi - 2006 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):382-400.
Mozi's Moral Theory: Breaking the Hermeneutical Stalemate.Daniel M. Johnson - 2011 - Philosophy East and West 61 (2):347-364.
Assessment of Li 利 in the Mencius and the Mozi.Wai Wai Chiu - 2014 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (2):199-214.
The Mozi as an Evolving Text: Different Voices in Early Chinese Thought.Carine Defoort & Nicolas Standaert (eds.) - 2013 - Brill.
Unfolding Mozi's Standard of Sound Doctrine.Steven A. Stegeman - 2011 - Asian Philosophy 21 (3):227 - 239.
Reconsidering Mo Tzu on the Foundations of Morality.Kristopher Duda - 2001 - Asian Philosophy 11 (1):23 – 31.
War and Ghosts in Mozi's Political Philosophy.Benjamin Wong & Hui-Chieh Loy - 2004 - Philosophy East and West 54 (3):343-363.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2015-09-02
Total downloads2 ( #778,003 of 2,178,151 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,021 of 2,178,151 )
How can I increase my downloads?