Presence and Post-Modernism

The post-modern, post-enlightenment debate on the nature of being begins with Heidegger’s assertion that the “ancient interpretation of the being of beings” is informed by “the determination of the sense of being as ... ‘presence.’”[i] This understanding, which reduces being to temporal presence, is supposed to have set all subsequent philosophical reflection. At its origin is “Aristotle’s essay on time.” In Heidegger’s reading, Aristotle interprets entities with regard to the present, equating their being with temporal presence. He also takes time itself as a present entity--i.e., “as just one being among others.”[ii] In an interpretation that is essentially “oriented to the world,” Aristotle thus collapses being and temporal presence to the point that the countable nows are, in their presence, taken as entities. Aristotle’s essay, Heidegger claims, “has essentially determined every subsequent account of time--Bergson’s included.” Even “the Kantian interpretation of time” remains under its sway.[iii] Given this, the “destruction” of the tradition that Heidegger proposes[iv] is a destruction of this account.[v] Only through such a destruction can we uncover what the Aristotelian account conceals. In making time objective, it hides Dasein’s (or human being’s) role in temporalization. The project of Being and Time is to uncover this through “the repeated interpretation of the structures of Dasein ... as modes of temporalization.”[vi]
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  History of Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1051-3558
DOI 10.5840/acpq199771241
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,625
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Heidegger on Presence: A Reply.Frederick A. Olafson - 1996 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (3 & 4):421 – 426.
Heidegger's Concept of Presence.Taylor Carman - 1995 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):431 – 453.
Gender and Time: Revisiting the Question of Dasein's Neutrality.Kevin Aho - 2007 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):137-155.
Individualism, Subjectivity, and Presence: A Response to Taylor Carman.Frederick A. Olafson - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (3):331 – 337.
Heidegger on Aristotle's “Metaphysical” God.Catriona Hanley - 1999 - Continental Philosophy Review 32 (1):19-28.
Being, Truth, and Presence in Heidegger's Thought.Frederick A. Olafson - 1998 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):45 – 64.
Phenomenological Problems for the Kairological Reading of Augenblick in Being and Time.Hakhamanesh Zangeneh - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (4):539 - 561.
Heidegger la Wittgenstein or 'Coping' with Professor Dreyfus.Frederick A. Olafson - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):45 – 64.
Heidegger and Dasein’s ‘Bodily Nature’: What is the Hidden Problematic?David R. Cerbone - 2000 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 8 (2):209 – 230.
All of a Sudden: Heidegger and Plato's Parmenides.Jussi Backman - 2007 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):393-408.


Added to PP index

Total views
46 ( #170,591 of 2,242,248 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #105,303 of 2,242,248 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature