Saying “I Don’t Know”: A Video-Based Study on Physicians’ Claims of No-Knowledge in Assisted Reproductive Technology Consultations

Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

IntroductionThe assisted reproductive technology field deals with consistent and predictable gaps in knowledge. Expressing lack of knowledge with a sentence like “I don’t know” can be challenging for doctors. This study examined physicians’ negative epistemic disclaimer “non lo so” in Italian ART doctor-couple interactions. In particular, it aimed to reveal specific features of “non lo so”: function, topic, temporality, responsibility, and interactional aspects.MethodsThis was a video-based observational study. We used microanalysis of face-to-face dialogue to analyze 20 purposively selected triadic consultations from a corpus of 85. This inductive analysis focused on the function, the content and some selected interactional aspects of the “non lo so”, quantifying and capturing the interaction between these qualitative features.ResultsWe found 82 doctors’ “non lo so” in the corpus. We discovered three main functions of this expression: propositional, relational, discursive. The most frequent topics raising doctors’ “non lo so” were costs, treatment-related aspects, and timing issues. In more than half of the cases, present issues emerged. The majority of “non lo so” was framed using the “I,” with doctors’ taking personal responsibility. Patients played a role in these expressions from doctors: Patients initiated more than one third of them, and in one fourth of the cases, patients followed up immediately.ConclusionOur findings may be related to characteristics of the specific field of ART. Doctors in this setting must frequently express a direct lack of knowledge to their patients, and when they do, they mean it literally. Patients contribute to such disclosures, and their responses suggest that they find them acceptable, showing that they may expect limitations in their potential to conceive.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

End-of-Life Discussion.Gabriella Foe - 2014 - Voices in Bioethics 1.
Doctors and patients: Partners or adversaries?Eugene J. Stein - 1980 - Journal of Medical Humanities 2 (2):118-122.
The Duty of the Patient to Cooperate.Jörg Löschke - 2017 - Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft Und Ethik 21 (1):7-26.
Are doctors altruistic?W. Glannon - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (2):68-69.
Dwelling in the Shadow: Physicians' Decision-Making for Terminally Ill Patients.Stephen Vanhooser Mccrary - 1992 - Dissertation, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Galveston

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-13

Downloads
5 (#1,514,558)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pål Gulbrandsen
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references