Legal Theory 25 (2):105-131 (2019)

Gabriel Mendlow
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
All observers of our legal system recognize that criminal statutes can be complex and obscure. But statutory obscurity often takes a particular form that most observers have overlooked: uncertainty about the identity of the wrong a statute aims to punish. It is not uncommon for parties to disagree about the identity of the underlying wrong even as they agree on the statute's elements. Hidden in plain sight, these unexamined disagreements underlie or exacerbate an assortment of familiar disputes—about venue, vagueness, and mens rea; about DUI and statutory rape; about hate crimes, child pornography, and counterterrorism laws; about proportionality in punishment; and about the proper ambit of the criminal law. Each of these disputes may hinge on deeper disagreements about the identity of the wrong a statute aims to punish, and these deeper disagreements can be surprisingly hard to resolve, fueled as they are by the complex inner structure of our penal laws and the discretionary mechanisms of their administration.
Keywords punishment  hate crimes  statutory rape  mala prohibita  thought crimes  discretion  statutory interpretation  proportionality  mens rea
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s1352325219000077
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,290
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Crime, Prohibition, and Punishment.R. A. Duff - 2002 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (2):97–108.
Punishment for Thoughts.Herbert Morris - 1965 - The Monist 49 (3):342-376.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Mala Prohibita and Proportionality.Youngjae Lee - 2021 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 15 (3):425-446.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reactive Sentiments and the Justification of Punishment.Andrew Engen - 2015 - Philosophy and Public Issues - Filosofia E Questioni Pubbliche 5 (1):173-205.
Communication, Expression, and the Justification of Punishment.Andy Engen - 2014 - Athens Journal of Humanities and Arts 1 (4):299-307.
The Problem of the Body in Modern State Punishment.David Garland - 2011 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 78 (4):767-798.
The Problem of the Body in Modern State Punishment.David Garland - 2011 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 78 (3):767-798.
Punishment: Consequentialism.David Wood - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (6):455-469.
How to Say Things with Walls.A. J. Skillen - 1980 - Philosophy 55 (214):509 - 523.
Der Zweck der Strafe Im Islamischen Strafrecht.Norbert Campagna - 2011 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 97 (3):360-377.
Inequality Aversion and Antisocial Punishment.Christian Thöni - 2014 - Theory and Decision 76 (4):529-545.
Pacifism and Punishment.J. Angelo Corlett - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (4):945-958.
Making Sense of Retributivism.J. Angelo Corlett - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (1):77-110.
The Passions of Punishment.Nathan Hanna - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):232-250.
Animal Punishment and the Conditions of Responsibility.Jon Garthoff - 2019 - Philosophical Papers 49 (1):69-105.


Added to PP index

Total views
33 ( #347,847 of 2,518,815 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #88,418 of 2,518,815 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes