Analysis in the critique of pure reason

Kantian Review 12 (1):61-89 (2007)
Abstract
The paper argues that existing interpretations of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason as an "analysis of experience" (e.g., those of Kitcher and Strawson) fail because they do not properly appreciate the method of the work. The author argues that the Critique provides an analysis of the faculty of reason, and counts as an analysis of experience only in a derivative sense.
Keywords method of the Critique of Pure Reason  philosophical analysis
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1369415400000819
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Kant on the `Symbolic Construction' of Mathematical Concepts.Lisa Shabel - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (4):589-621.
The Role of Reflection in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason.Houston Smit - 1999 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (2):203–223.
Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1991 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
207 ( #20,420 of 2,197,351 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #10,008 of 2,197,351 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature