Analysis in the critique of pure reason

Kantian Review 12 (1):61-89 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper argues that existing interpretations of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason as an "analysis of experience" (e.g., those of Kitcher and Strawson) fail because they do not properly appreciate the method of the work. The author argues that the Critique provides an analysis of the faculty of reason, and counts as an analysis of experience only in a derivative sense.

Similar books and articles

Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1781/1998 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
The Role of Reflection in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason.Houston Smit - 1999 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (2):203–223.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
457 (#22,360)

6 months
31 (#34,349)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Melissa M Merritt
University of New South Wales