A Kantian Critique of Kant's Theory of Punishment

Law and Philosophy 19 (3):311-338 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In contrast to the traditional view of Kant as apure retributivist, the recent interpretations ofKant's theory of punishment (for instance Byrd's)propose a mixed theory of retributivism and generalprevention. Although both elements are literallyright, I try to show the shortcomings of each. I thenargue that Kant's theory of punishment is notconsistent with his own concept of law. Thus I proposeanother justification for punishment: specialdeterrence and rehabilitation. Kant's critique ofutilitarianism does not affect this alternative, whichmoreover has textual support in Kant and is fullyconsistent with his concept of law.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,685

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Kantian critique of Kant's theory of punishment.Merle J.-C. - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (3):311-338.
Kant's Theory of Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2003 - Utilitas 15 (2):206.
Foundations of a Kantian theory of punishment.J. Angelo Corlett - 1993 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):263-283.
Die Begründung der Strafe bei Kant.Wolfgang Enderlein - 1985 - Kant Studien 76 (1-4):303-327.
German Idealism and the Concept of Punishment.Jean-Christophe Merle - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kant on capital punishment and suicide.Attila Ataner - 2006 - Kant Studien 97 (4):452-482.
Kant on wrongdoing, desert, and punishment.Thomas E. Hill - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (4):407 - 441.
Kant on Wrongdoing, Desert, and Punishment.Thomas E. Hill - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (4):407-441.


Added to PP

9 (#1,068,940)

6 months
4 (#313,042)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references