Are Language Conventions Philosophically Explanatory?

Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):111-124 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Conventional behavior is behavior engaged in because of, or due to, convention. There are two senses of “due to”: the convention explains my behavior by actually causing it; or the convention explains my behavior by providing reasons I have for engaging in this behavior. Either way, behaviors cannot be explained by conventions unless the conventions exist; and conventions cannot provide me with (conscious) reasons for engaging in my behavior unless I know what they are. I argue that, far from causing behavior, conventions are the results of behavior: conventions exist, in the sense in which they may be said to exist at all, only retrospectively. Moreover, as natural language speakers, we are ever at best in the position of thinking we know what the conventions are. But thinking one is acting conventionally is not the same thing as acting conventionally. Claims about the role of convention in linguistic competence interestingly both mirror and differ from claims about the role of genes in evolutionary theory, as I briefly pointout by way of conclusion.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Language conventions made simple.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 1998 - Journal of Philosophy 95 (4):161-180.
Agreements, conventions, and language.Margaret Gilbert - 1983 - Synthese 54 (3):375 - 407.
Convention.Michael Rescorla - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Conventions made too simple?Martin Bunzl & Richard Kreuter - 2003 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (4):417-426.
A value-based argument model of convention degradation.Paul E. Dunne - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (1):153-188.
Imitation and conventional communication.Richard Moore - 2013 - Biology and Philosophy 28 (3):481-500.
Game Theory and “Convention‘.Margaret Gilbert - 1981 - Synthese 46 (1):41 - 93.
Norms and conventions.Nicholas Southwood & Lina Eriksson - 2011 - Philosophical Explorations 14 (2):195 - 217.


Added to PP

54 (#282,416)

6 months
8 (#283,518)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What refers? How?Alexander Barber - 2011 - In Ken Turner (ed.), Making semantics pragmatic. Brill. pp. 49–80.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references