Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (2):207-214 (2018)

Abstract
Empirical bioethics is commonly understood as integrating empirical research with normative-ethical research in order to address an ethical issue. Methodological analyses in empirical bioethics mainly focus on the integration of socio-empirical sciences and normative ethics. But while there are numerous multidisciplinary research projects combining life sciences and normative ethics, there is few explicit methodological reflection on how to integrate both fields, or about the goals and rationales of such interdisciplinary cooperation. In this paper we will review some drivers for the tendency of empirical bioethics methodologies to focus on the collaboration of normative ethics with particularly social sciences. Subsequently, we argue that the ends of empirical bioethics, not the empirical methods, are decisive for the question of which empirical disciplines can contribute to empirical bioethics in a meaningful way. Using already existing types of research integration as a springboard, five possible types of research which encompass life sciences and normative analysis will illustrate how such cooperation can be conceptualized from a methodological perspective within empirical bioethics. We will conclude with a reflection on the limitations and challenges of empirical bioethics research that integrates life sciences.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11019-017-9792-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,657
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Experimental Philosophy.Joshua Knobe - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (1):81–92.
Empirical Ethics, Context-Sensitivity, and Contextualism.Albert Musschenga - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):467 – 490.

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Knowledge and the Social Sciences: Theory, Method, Practice.David Goldblatt (ed.) - 2000 - Routledge, in Association with Open University.
Ethical Boundary Work: Geneticization, Philosophy and the Social Sciences.Adam M. Hedgecoe - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (3):305-309.
Deleuze and Research Methodologies.Rebecca Coleman & Jessica Ringrose (eds.) - 2013 - Edinburgh University Press.
The Aesthetics of Research Methodologies in the Social Sciences.David E. W. Fenner - 2006 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2):311-330.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-07-22

Total views
20 ( #544,542 of 2,462,340 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,152 of 2,462,340 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes